There
is an interesting conundrum in the generational gap. The desire for stories to be told from what
many have deemed as “the greatest generation,” meets up with the resistance to
sharing those stories; coupled with those to whom the stories belong passing
away. In Nobody’s Business, Alan Berliner faces an uphill battle in getting
his father to share his past and his commitment to discovering his family.
The interplay of dialogue between father and
son was paramount in the piece, and one of the main justifications that this
piece worked so well in the participatory mode.
His father vehemently explains: “There is nothing special about me. You are wasting your time.” The collaboration and
confrontation that Nichols describes in his book is imperative in a
participatory piece such as this. The
filmmaker and the social actor’s interchange create an emotional roller coaster for the participants and the audience alike.
What his father deems as “terribly unimportant” (the making of this
film) becomes a crucial matter for Allan; someone still struggling to make
sense of his parent’s divorce and his crumbling relationships with them.
Further,
the questions upon which Nichols expounds on page 182, highlight the ethics of
this line of questioning. While it
appears that the filmmaker is badgering his aged father, he feels a distinct
obligation to use whatever methods necessary to get the story out of him. Intermixing archival
footage and interviews, Allan won't give up on his questioning. He even finds clever metaphors to weave
throughout the piece – like
the boxing footage or the house falling into the
river to add both humor and imagery to the film; at the same time using those metaphors
to give us direct insight into how he, as a filmmaker and a son, feels about
this entire process. By making his
emotions accessible to us, he forms an empathetic partnership from which we can
view the piece. The negotiated
relationship is created simply because there is a camera present. Who knows if this could have even happened
without the formal presence of the camera?



No comments:
Post a Comment